Yes, it’s been a while since the last set of links. I’ll try to do better. Enjoy these for now.<\/p>\n
Carl Zimmer wrote an article<\/a> on Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva for the Atlantic. One of the reasons I think it’s important to read stories like these is to see examples of the success that comes from investigating genetic origins of diseases. Another is to show that there are real reasons that a treatment may or may not be produced outside of the simple profitability of the treatment itself. All in all, this is a great story with some human interest thrown in for good measure.<\/p>\n I’ve often had the discussion with people about how even though we have names for colors, not everyone perceives them the same way. Well. . .who’d have known it? Apparently some of our perception differences arise from how we name the colors in the first place! Empirical Zeal discusses it in two parts. Part 1.<\/a> Part 2.<\/a> Scicurious<\/a> has an interesting piece about genes and environment. . .interesting not only because it shows an actual mechanistic result in the brain that can differentiate genetically identical mice, but also because those of us on SSRIs can take comfort in knowing our meds are assisting us in hippocampal neurogenesis.<\/p>\n Another thing that seems to be related to a mechanical malfunction in the brain is Body Integrity Identity Disorder, in which a person is uncomfortable with the very presence of a part of his or her body. Mindscapes: The man who needs to paralyse himself<\/a> in New Scientist talks about some of the possible roots of this condition that makes people seek elective amputation procedures. <\/p>\n From Nature, an explanation of what a chemical is<\/a>, and why it’s not inherently dangerous or toxic. And. . .a tap-dancing seagull.<\/p>\n
\n
\nBeyond Recognition: The Incredible Story of a Face Transplant<\/a> Yes, it’s graphic, but it’s also absolutely amazing.<\/p>\n
\n
\nSome tips<\/a> on distinguishing science journalism from infotainment.<\/p>\n