Sorry this is short. Time just got away from me. Enjoy!<\/p>\n
Why all medical professionals need to study evolution. <\/a> I think everyone should, period.<\/p>\n Excellent piece on gender disparities in the study of Autism<\/a> by Virginia Hughes. This applies to ADHD, too, and it would be nice to see something this well-written on that.<\/p>\n Dorothy Bishop<\/a> points out the shortcomings in a neuroimaging and genetics study, and in doing so, tells you some things you should be able to find in a good one.<\/p>\n Continuing on the potential pitfalls of neuroimaging studies, here’s a longread<\/a> that explains in detail what happens when images are taken and analyzed for study. It should give you some perspective next time you see an article claiming that scientists have found something amazing in the brain that explains a huge chunk of cognition or emotion.<\/p>\n There was a scientific dust-up last week in which a journal had to retract a good number of papers because of problems with peer review. Nature suggests a double-blind system.<\/a> Unfortunately, this isn’t much different from what’s supposed to be happening now, and it’s flawed. Nature even makes note of the bias in the current system, so I’m wondering why they are recommending this.<\/p>\n Kids who are raised by same-sex parents actually do pretty well.<\/a><\/p>\n Biodiversity is key to our survival. Scientific American<\/a> shows us maps where biodiversity exists at high levels – right in the same spots that are threatened by global warming.<\/p>\n I love my pets, too, but this is kind of gross:<\/p>\n